Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Focus and Scope of Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro (JNTE) are:

  • Electrical power and energy
  • Telecomunication and Signal Processing
  • Automatic Control and Robotic

 

Section Policies

Electrical Power and Energy

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Telecommunication

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Control

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Publication of articles in Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro (JNTE) is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. JNTE acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers. 

Initial evaluation of manuscripts

The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the  scope of JNTE. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review. At this stage, editors will check for possible similarities in submitted articles compared to other periodicals, journals, and conference proceedings previously published. The tool used is Turnitin similarity checker.

Peer review

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication.

Review process of the manuscript at JNTE is conducted using double blind review process i.e. authors do not know the reviewers of their paper and reviewers do not know the author(s) of the manuscript that they review.

Review reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

  • Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly
  • Is methodologically sound
  • Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
  • Correctly references previous relevant work
  • Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer review process.

Decision

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.

Becoming a Reviewer

If you are not currently a reviewer for JNTE, but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us. The benefits of reviewing for JNTE include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in related research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in our list of reviewers. You may also be able to cite your work for JNTE as part of your professional development requirements.

 

Publication Frequency

JNTE publishes three times a year i.e. March, July and November. 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Benefits of open access for the author, include:

  • Free access for all users worldwide
  • Authors retain copyright to their work
  • Increased visibility and readership
  • Rapid publication
  • No spatial constraints

 

Fees

No fees incurred for submission, reviewing and publishing the articles .

 

Publication Ethics Statement

JNTE is a peer-reviewed journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the publisher (Universitas Andalas). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

 

Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism is not acceptable and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (penalties) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in JNTE. JNTE will use Turnitin's originality checking software as our tool for detecting similarities of texts in articles.

 

Reference Management

Articles submitted to JNTE shall use reference management software such as EndNote® or Mendeley

 

Retraction (Erratum/Corrigedum)

The papers published in JNTE will be considered for a retraction if :

  • They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
  • the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  • it constitutes plagiarism
  • it reports unethical research
  • The mechanism of retraction follows the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf.



 

  

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Statistic and Traffic