Intermittent Oscillation Diagnosis in a Control Loop Using Extreme Gradient Boosting
Main Article Content
Keywords
Abstract
The control loop in the industry is a component that must be maintained because it will determine the plant's performance. Most industrial controllers experience oscillations with various causes, such as noise, oscillation, backlash, dead band, hysteresis, random variation, and poor controller tuning. The oscillation diagnosis system, which can understand the oscillation type characteristics, is built based on machine learning because it is dynamic and not based on specific rules. This study developed an online oscillation diagnosis program using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) method. The data was obtained through the simulation of the Tennessee Eastman process. The data is segmented on specific window sizes, and then time series feature extraction is performed. The extraction results are then used to build an XGBoost model capable of performing oscillation diagnosis tasks. There are seven types of oscillations tested in this study. The model that has been made is implemented online with the help of sliding windows. The results show that the XGBoost model performs best when the data window size is 100, with the accuracy performance and the F1 score of the model in classifying the type of oscillation being 0.918 and 0.905, respectively. The model can detect the type of oscillation with an average diagnosis time of 712 seconds on diagnostic tests.
References
Y. Shardt et al., “Determining the state of a process control system: Current trends and future challenges,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 217–245, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1002/cjce.20653.
R. Srinivasan, R. Rengaswamy, and R. Miller, “Control Loop Performance Assessment. 1. A Qualitative Approach for Stiction Diagnosis,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 44, no. 17, pp. 6708–6718, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1021/ie0490280.
M. Yağcı and Y. Arkun, “An Integrated Application of Control Performance Assessment and Root Cause Analysis in Refinery Control Loops,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 11650–11655, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.651.
S. Shayestehmanesh and J. C. Peyton Jones, “Stochastic modeling and prediction of IMEP for closed loop knock control performance assessment,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 92, p. 104130, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.104130.
L. Desborough and R. Miller, “Increasing Customer Value of Industrial Control Performance Monitoring — Honeywell’s Experience,” AIChE Symp. Ser., p. 153, 2002.
M. A. Paulonis and J. W. Cox, “A Practical Approach for Large-Scale Controller Performance Assessment, Diagnosis, and Improvement,” J. Process Control, vol. 13, p. 155, 2003.
J. W. V. Dambros, J. O. Trierweiler, and M. Farenzena, “Oscillation detection in process industries – Part I: Review of the detection methods,” Journal of Process Control, vol. 78, pp. 108–123, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2019.04.002.
Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, and Q. Zhao, “Online Monitoring of Low-Frequency Oscillation Based on the Improved Analytical Modal Decomposition Method,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 215256–215266, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040848.
L. Xie, X. Lang, A. Horch, and Y. Yang, “Online Oscillation Detection in the Presence of Signal Intermittency,” Control Eng. Pract., vol. 55, p. 91, 2016.
J. W. V. Dambros, J. O. Trierweiler, M. Farenzena, and M. Kloft, “Oscillation Detection in Process Industries by a Machine Learning-Based Approach,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 58, no. 31, pp. 14180–14192, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01456.
N. Effendy, E. D. Kurniawan, K. Dwiantoro, A. Arif, and N. Muddin, “The Prediction of Oxygen Content of the Flue Gas in a Gas-Fired Boiler System Using Neural Networks and Random Forest,” IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 923–929, 2022.
S. N. Sembodo, N. Effendy, K. Dwiantoro, and N. Muddin, “Radial basis network estimator of oxygen content in the flue gas of debutanizer reboiler,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 3044–3050, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v12i3.pp3044-3050.
N. Effendy, D. Ruhyadi, R. Pratama, D. F. Rabba, A. F. Aulia, and A. Y. Atmadja, “Forest quality assessment based on bird sound recognition using convolutional neural networks,” International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), vol. 12, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v12i4.pp4235-4242.
M. A. Dwijaya, U. A. Ahmad, R. P. Wijayanto, and R. A. Nugrahaeni, “Model Design of The Image Recognition of Lung CT Scan for COVID-19 Detection Using Artificial Neural Network,” JNTE, pp. 21–28, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.25077/jnte.v11n1.984.2022.
M. Ismail and S. A. D. Prasetyowati, “Classification Of Alcohol Type Using Gas Sensor And K-Nearest Neighbor,” JNTE, pp. 59–64, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.25077/jnte.v11n1.989.2022.
K. Amiroh, B. A. S. Aji, and F. Z. Rahmanti, “Real-Time Accident Detection Using KNN Algorithm to Support IoT-based Smart City,” JNTE, pp. 65–70, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.25077/jnte.v11n1.999.2022.
E. D. Kurniawan, N. Effendy, A. Arif, K. Dwiantoro, and N. Muddin, “Soft sensor for the prediction of oxygen content in boiler flue gas using neural networks and extreme gradient boosting,” Neural Comput & Applic, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07771-8.
X. Gao and J. Hou, “An improved SVM integrated GS-PCA fault diagnosis approach of Tennessee Eastman process,” Neurocomputing, vol. 174, pp. 906–911, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.10.018.
Z. Zhang and J. Zhao, “A deep belief network based fault diagnosis model for complex chemical processes,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 107, pp. 395–407, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.02.041.
H. Wu and J. Zhao, “Deep convolutional neural network model based chemical process fault diagnosis,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 115, pp. 185–197, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2018.04.009.
P. Park, P. D. Marco, H. Shin, and J. Bang, “Fault Detection and Diagnosis Using Combined Autoencoder and Long Short-Term Memory Network,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 21, p. 4612, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19214612.
Y. Yao, J. Zhang, W. Luo, and Y. Dai, “A Hybrid Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Strategy for Chemical Processes Based on Penalty Iterative Optimization,” Processes, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 1266, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/pr9081266.
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The authors declare that:
1. This paper has not been published in the same form elsewhere.
2. It will not be submitted anywhere else for publication prior to acceptance/rejection by this Journal.
3. A copyright permission is obtained for materials published elsewhere and which require this permission for reproduction.