Komparasi Pengendali PI Dan PID untuk Tegangan Keluaran Konverter Buck

Main Article Content

Krismadinata Krismadinata
Irma Husnaini

Keywords

Abstract

This paper discusses comparison of the output voltage dynamic response of buck converter that employing controller Proportional Integral (PI), and Proportional Integral Derivative (PID). Design and simulation of a buck converter output voltage is performed using Matlab. The performance of buck converter has been verified by the theoretically and graphically. Those simulations shown that PID controller has been better performance than the PI controller.

Keywords :Buck converter, PI, PID


Abstrak

Tulisan ini membahas komparasi tanggapan dinamik dari tegangan keluaran konverter buck dengan menerapkan pengendali  Proportional Integral (PI) dan Proportional Integral Derivative (PID). Perancangan dan simulasi tegangan keluaran konverter buck ini dilakukan menggunakan Matlab. Unjuk kerja dari konverter buck dianalisa secara teoritis dan grafis. Hasil simulasi memperlihatkan penerapan pengendali PID pada konverter buck memiliki unjuk kerja lebih baik dibandingkan pengendali PI.

Kata Kunci : Konverter buck, PI, PID


References

D. M. M. S. Prabha, S. P. Kumar, and G. G. Devadhas, "Anoptimum
setting of controller for a dc-dc converter usingbacterial intelligence
technique," in Proc. PES Innovative SmartGrid Technologies Conf.,
2011, pp. 204-210.

M. Namnabat, M. B. Poudeh, and S. Eshtehardiha, "Comparisonthe
control methods in improvement the performance of the DC- DC converter," in Proc. Power Electronics Conf., 2007, pp. 246-251

N. R Mude, and Ashish Sahu, “Adaptive Control Schemes For DC-DC Buck Converter” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol. 2, Issue 3, May-Jun 2012, pp. 463-467

M. Kheirmand, M. Mahdavian, M. B. Poudeh, and S.Eshtehardiha, "Intelligent modern controller on DC-DCconverter," in Proc. IEEE Region 10 Conf., 2008, pp. 1-5.

K. Wei, Q. Sun, B. Liang, and M. Du, "The research of
adaptivefuzzy PID control algorithm based on LQR approach in DC-DC converter," in Proc. Computational Intelligence Conf., vol. 1,2008, pp. 139-143.

P. Gupta and A. Patra, "Hybrid sliding mode control of DC-DCpower converter circuits," in Proc. Convergent Technologies for the Asia-Pacific Region Conf., vol. 1, 2003, pp. 259-263.

G. Keller, D. Lascu, and J. M. A. Myrzik, "State-space control structures for buck converters with/without input filter," in Proc. Power Electronics and Applications Conf., 2005, pp. 1-10.

Eka Prasetyono, Wima Ashary, Anang Tjahjono, Novie Ayub Windarko, “Studi Komparasi Fungsi Keanggotaan Fuzzy sebagai Kontroler Bidirectional DC-DC Converter pada Sistem Penyimpan Energi” Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro Vol 4, No 2: September 2015, pp. 220 - 226

İ. Atacak and Ö. F. Bay, "Tuning gain parameters of a PI controller using genetic algorithm for boost dc-dc converter," in Proc.
International Advanced Technologies Symp., 2009, pp. 221-225.

H. N. Koivo, "Tuning of a multivariable PID-controller for unknown systems," in Proc. IEEE Decision and ControlIncluding the Symposium on Adaptive Processes Conf., vol. 19,1980, pp. 1158-1159.

D. M. Bain and G. D. Martin, "Simple PID tuning and PID closed loop simulation," in Proc. American Control ConferenceConf., 1983, pp. 338-341.

J. G. Ziegler, N. B. Nichols, and N. Y. Rochester, Optimum settings for automatic controllers," Transactions of the ASME, vol.64, pp. 759-768, 1942.

Phillips, L. Charles and Phillips, RoyceD. Harbor, Feedback Control Systems,.4th Edition, Prentice Hall International, 2000

Ogata, K, Modern Control Engineering, Fifth Edition, Pearson Education, Inc., 2010.