A GWO-P&O Algorithm MPPT for PV Systems Under UIC and PSC

Main Article Content

Muyassar Muyassar
Tarmizi
Yuwaldy Away

Keywords

Abstract

The operation of PV systems can experience uniform (UIC) and partial insolation (PSC) that depends on its environment. Many MPPT algorithm has been proposed in literature such as P&O, and many metaheuristics algorithm such as PSO and GWO. Those algorithm only work at a certain environmental condition. The P&O algorithm only work at UIC but fail to track maximum power at PSC hence reducing efficiency of MPPT system when it is experiencing UIC and PSC. The GWO algorithm can track maximum power at PSC but when the change of insolation to UIC can shift power output below maximum power hence reducing efficiency of MPPT system. In this paper another method is proposed by implementing the result of GWO to the input of the P&O algorithm subsequently the GWO is reset periodically to search a new maximum power point to anticipate any environmental changes. This new method is called a GWO-P&O algorithm. Simulation results show that the GWO-P&O algorithm yields better efficiency compared to the GWO or the P&O algorithm in case the modules of PV array experiencing UIC and PSCs. Simulation is done using MATLAB/SIMULINK software.

References

S. L. Brunton and C. W. Rowley, “Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic Optimization Using Ripple- Based Extremum Seeking Control IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics : Accepted 25-Apr-2010 Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic Optimization Using Ripple-Based Extremum Seeking Control,” no. November, 2010, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2010.2049747.

S. R. Pendem and S. Mikkili, “Modeling , simulation and performance analysis of solar PV array configurations ( Series , Series – Parallel and Honey-Comb ) to extract maximum power under Partial Shading Conditions,” Energy Reports, vol. 4, pp. 274–287, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.03.003.

K. M. Paasch et al., “Simulation of the impact of moving clouds on large scale PV-plants,” pp. 791–796, 2014.

J. E. Salazar-duque, E. I. Ortiz-rivera, and D. C. Bogotá, “Modified Perturb and Observe MPPT Algorithm Based on a Narrow Set of Initial Conditions,” pp. 5–8.

S. Mohanty, B. Subudhi, and P. K. Ray, “A new MPPT design using grey Wolf optimization technique for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 181–188, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2482120.

C. Santhan and R. S. Rao, “Enhanced Grey Wolf Optimizer Based MPPT Algorithm of PV System Under Partial Shaded Condition,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 203–212, 2017.

H. Patel, V. Agarwal, and S. Member, “MATLAB-Based Modeling to Study the Effects of Partial Shading on PV Array Characteristics,” vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 302–310, 2008.

Z. Gao and J. Zhao, “An Improved Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm with Variable Weights,” vol. 2019, 2019.

L. Sbita, “Improved PSO : A Comparative Study in MPPT Algorithm for PV System Control under Partial Shading Conditions,” 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13082035.

X. H. Nguyen, “Matlab / Simulink Based Modeling to Study Effect of Partial Shadow on Solar Photovoltaic Array,” Environ. Syst. Res., pp. 1–10, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s40068-015-0042-1.

S. Mirjalili, S. M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, “Grey Wolf Optimizer,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 69, pp. 46–61, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.

N. A. Naamandadin and W. A. Mustafa, “Relationship between Solar Irradiance and Power Generated by Photovoltaic Panel : Case Study at UniCITI Alam Campus , Padang Besar , Malaysia,” no. January 2019, 2018.

J. A. Ramos, E. Zulueta, O. Barambones, and P. Eguia, “Obtaining the characteristics curves of a photocell by different methods,” no. March, 2013, doi: 10.24084/repqj11.455.

P. R. L, “Design and Implementation of Perturb & Observe MPPT Algorithm under Partial Shading Conditions ( PSC ) for DC-DC Boost Converter by Simulation analysis,” pp. 4–7, 2020.

B. Pakkiraiah and G. D. Sukumar, “Research Survey on Various MPPT Performance Issues to Improve the Solar PV System Efficiency,” J. Sol. Energy, vol. 2016, pp. 1–20, 2016, doi: 10.1155/2016/8012432.

T. Tarmizi, S. Syahrial, and F. Fathurrahman, “Design of PV System with DC distribution for Rural Electricity,” pp. 46–50, 2021.

D. Sera, S. Member, R. Teodorescu, S. Member, J. Hantschel, and M. Knoll, “Optimized Maximum Power Point Tracker for Fast-Changing Environmental Conditions,” vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2629–2637, 2008.

J. Shi, F. Xue, Z. Qin, L. Ling, T. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Tracking the global maximum power point of a photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions using a modified firefly algorithm,” vol. 033501, 2016, doi: 10.1063/1.4948524.

M. Abdulkadir, S. Member, A. S. Samosir, A. H. M. Yatim, and S. Member, “Modelling and Simulation of Maximum Power Point Tracking of Photovoltaic System in Simulink model,” no. December, pp. 2–5, 2012.

N. Hashim, Z. Salam, and D. Johari, “DC-DC boost converter design for fast and accurate MPPT algorithms in stand-alone photovoltaic system DC-DC Boost Converter Design for Fast and Accurate MPPT Algorithms in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic System,” no. September, pp. 1038–1050, 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijpeds.v9n3.pp1038-1050.

M. Rashid, Power Electronics, Devices, Circuit and Applications, Fourth Edi. Pearson, 2014.