Test–Retest Reliability of the FIBOD System for Postural Stability Assessment

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Yvonne Yee Woon Khor
Eileen L. M. Su
Nurul Ashikin Binti Abdul Kadir
Muhammad Najib bin Abdullah
Sivakumar Balasubramanian
Satria Mandala

Keywords

Sensor-based balance assessment, Postural stability, FIBOD, Balance board, Single Trial

Abstract

Accurate balance assessment is essential for rehabilitation and fall-risk evaluation. Traditional observation-based tools such as the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) are widely used but are limited by subjectivity and observer bias. The FIBOD is a novel sensor-based wobble board system that provides objective and quantitative assessment of postural stability using integrated inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. This study aimed to evaluate the within-session test–retest reliability of the FIBOD system and to determine whether a simplified single-trial protocol can provide results comparable to repeated measurements. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 171 healthy adults (mean age = 36.5 ± 13.4 years) who performed two consecutive FIBOD balance assessments. The Overall Stability Index (OSI) values from both trials (T1, T2) were analysed using the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality, Bland–Altman analysis for agreement, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC (2,1)) for reliability. Post-hoc power analysis was performed to confirm statistical adequacy. The first trial exhibited an approximately normal distribution (p = 0.065), whereas the second showed a significant deviation (p = 0.001). A small mean bias of +0.12 OSI units and narrow 95% limits of agreement (–1.30 to +1.54) indicated good agreement between trials. Reliability analysis demonstrated good within-session consistency (ICC (2,1) = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.83–0.92). Post-hoc power analysis (α = 0.05, d = 0.40) yielded a statistical power of 0.999. The FIBOD system demonstrated strong reliability and agreement between consecutive trials. These findings suggest the potential feasibility of a single-trial protocol as a time-efficient and clinically practical approach for balance assessment.

References

Nguyen, H. T. P., Woo, Y., Huynh, N. N., and Jeong, H. (2022). Scoring of human body-balance ability on wobble board based on the geometric solution. Applied Sciences, 12, 5967.

Hsieh, K. L., et al. (2019). Smartphone technology can measure postural stability and discriminate fall risk in older adults. Gait & Posture, 67, 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.005

Dawson, N., Dzurino, D., Karleskint, M., and Tucker, J. (2018). Examining the reliability, correlation, and validity of commonly used assessment tools to measure balance. Health Science Reports, 1, e98. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.98

Meseguer-Henarejos, A. B., Rubio-Aparicio, M., López-Pina, J. A., Carles-Hernández, R., and Gómez-Conesa, A. (2019). Characteristics that affect score reliability in the Berg Balance Scale: a meta-analytic reliability generalization study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 55, 570–584.

Noamani, A., Nazarahari, M., Lewicke, J., Vette, A. H., and Rouhani, H. (2020). Validity of using wearable inertial sensors for assessing the dynamics of standing balance. Medical Engineering & Physics, 77, 53–59.

Galán-Mercant, A., and Cuesta-Vargas, A. I. (2014). Mobile Romberg test assessment (mRomberg). BMC Research Notes, 7, 640.

Abdollah, V., Noamani, A., Ralston, J., Ho, C., and Rouhani, H. (2024). Effect of test duration and sensor location on the reliability of standing balance parameters derived using body-mounted accelerometers. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 23, 2.

Felius, R. A. W., Geerars, M., Bruijn, S. M., Wouda, N. C., van Dieën, J. H., and Punt, M. (2022). Reliability of IMU-based balance assessment in clinical stroke rehabilitation. Gait & Posture, 98, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.005

Zaghlul, N., Goh, S. L., Razman, R., Danaee, M., and Chan, C. (2023). Test-retest reliability of the single-leg stance on a Lafayette stability platform. PLOS https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-8692202430012021_0037iONE, 18, e0280361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280361

Khor, K. X., Yeong, C. F., Su, E. L. M., et al. (2021). Balance Assessment for Double and Single Leg Stance using FIBOD Balance System. In 3rd International Conference for Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Life Sciences (pp. 103–110).

Khor, Y. Y. W., Su, E. L. M., and Khor, K. X. 2023. Comparison between Romberg test with sensor-based balance assessment using electronic wobble board. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2622: International Conference on Electronic and Computer Engineering 2023 (ECE 2023). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/2622/1/012009.

Santana, W. J., et al. “Recovery between sets in strength training: systematic review and meta-analysis.” Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte 30 (2023). It shows that rest intervals between 3-4 min are effective for high-intensity sets. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-8692202430012021_0037i

Mishra, Prabhaker et al. “Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data.” Annals of cardiac anaesthesia vol. 22,1 (2019): 67-72. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Wang T, Liu M, Bao B, et al. Balance evaluation system using wearable IMU sensing. Measurement and Control. 2024;58(2):281-292. doi:10.1177/00202940241258828

Park, Young & Jang, Ho & Kim, Kwon & Hwang, Dong & Lee, Suk. (2022). Reliability and Validity Study of Inertial Sensor-Based Application for Static Balance Measurement. Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science. 11. 311-320. 10.14474/ptrs.2022.11.3.311.

Brahms, Clemens & Heinzel, Stephan & Rapp, Michael & Mückstein, Marie & Hortobagyi, Tibor & Stelzel, Christine & Granacher, Urs. (2022). The acute effects of mental fatigue on balance performance in healthy young and older adults -A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica. 225. 103540. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103540.

Swanenburg, J., de Bruin, E.D., Favero, K. et al. The reliability of postural balance measures in single and dual tasking in elderly fallers and non-fallers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 9, 162 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-162

Li, K.-J.; Wong, N.L.-Y.; Law, M.-C.; Lam, F.M.-H.; Wong, H.-C.; Chan, T.-O.; Wong, K.-N.; Zheng, Y.-P.; Huang, Q.-Y.; Wong, A.Y.-L.; et al. Reliability, Validity, and Identification Ability of a Commercialized Waist-Attached Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Sensor-Based System in Fall Risk Assessment of Older People. Biosensors 2023, 13, 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13120998

Shreffler J, Huecker MR. Type I and Type II Errors and Statistical Power. [Updated 2023 Mar 13]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557530/?utm_source

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.